Local Politics

Charles Arthur has a thoughtful screed up this morning about why he’ll vote Green, though he lives in a constituency with an unshakeable Conservative majority — and the MP is the deputy speaker.

It’s a nice argument, but I live in the same constituency and I have news. There is no Green candidate here. What we do have, perhaps uniquely, is three candidates to the right of Michael Howard — Ukip, Veritas, and English Democracy.

This is worrying for social democrats, in a deep way. The reason people move out here from civilisation is really, of course that the state schools are incomparably better than in London. State provision works, probably because the children are better parented. But why is it that state provision works better in places where the political culture is so much opposed to it?

Posted in British politics | 4 Comments

Who’s your Pope?

I know there is at least one German-speaking Catholic reader of this blog and was originally just going to post for his benefit a link here which goes to a pisstake of Bild Zeitung’s headline on the election of Pope Benedict, which was Wir sind Papst or “We are Pope”. But the story got better.

A German satirical blog invited readers to illustrate this news with photoshop, and hundreds obliged, sending in pictures of themselves as Holy Father. After a while, Bild itself picked this up and ran a story about the new craze — illustrated, of course, with a pretty and female Pope. But they didn’t ask her permission, and now she is suing them …

Sometimes people ask why on earth I use OpenOffice. Well, it’s because the developers point to stories like this on their blogs.

Posted in God, Journalism | Comments Off on Who’s your Pope?

Below the fold

is Cthulhu’s own concept album: a lyric mashup of Tori Amos and Raymond Tallis. Every line in this horror has been printed. There are people paid to take every line seriously. There is also the FWB, who made this song.

Continue reading

Posted in Blather | 2 Comments

Greedy young hobbledehobbit

It turns out you can’t photocopy the bound volumes of the Times and TLS in the London Library. They’re too fragile. Typing is hard on a reading pulpit, but I copied out the last three paragraphs (about half) of Alfred Duggan’s review of The Fellowship of the Ring, from August 27th, 1954. I don’t know that anyone else understood it to be an allegory of the Cold War, but it’s surprisingly little dated, except for the best joke. “Hobbledehoy” is now far less used than the pseudo-archaisms of Tolkein’s invention, like “hobbit”.

Continue reading

Posted in Literature | Comments Off on Greedy young hobbledehobbit

Unlikely imaginations clash

Two people wrote to the Guardian to complain that Alfred Duggan had never lived at Blenheim. Er. Hrmph. An error in transmission, as we used to say before email removed that alibi. However, poking around Google print revealed the unlikely fact that he had, in 1954, reviewed the Fellowship of the Ring for the TLS. I have to go into that part of London this evening anyway, for a lecture at the Royal Society, so I shall pop into the London Library and look it up. With the aid of the Xerox machine, I may even bring a copy home.

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on Unlikely imaginations clash

old fart baffled by new technology

When I lived in London, there were cassette stalls in the Portobello market which had bootlegs of all the interesting gigs in town. Where is the electronic equivalent for people who wanted to know what Cream sounded like last night?

Posted in Blather | 6 Comments

almost tolerable powerpoint

Here is a very interesting slideshow, found through Ros Taylor on the Guardian’s election blog. I have posted about it before, when I took the survey, but this is a very lucid explanation of the Axis of UKIP, as they call hostility to foreigners and criminals.

What strikes me is that the Axis of UKIP corresponds very closely to the Liberal / traditionalist divide in Protestant Christianity, which is not about sex but boundaries. It just so happens that sexual behaviour is the boundary easiest to cross in a modern society.

Posted in British politics | 2 Comments

The wheel of progress

You’d think that handwriting was easier to identify than typewriting. But when the latest Government memorandum on the war was leaked, it came hand-written, copied from a computerised original to make the leak harder to trace.

Evidence that this was wise came when the US Army put up its PDF report into the shooting of an Italian secret service agent at a road block. Chunks of this were blacked out for public consumption. La Repubblica discovered that if you select a chunk with these blacked-out portions in, then copy and paste it into something else, the hidden bits appear. And so we learn that

From 1 November 2004 to 12 March 2005 there were a total of 3306 attacks in the Baghdad area. Of these, 2400 were directed against Coalition Forces.

No wonder the US army removed1 the PDF pronto. 2,400 attacks on the American army in Baghdad alone in four months! We must send Mark Steyn to investigate and explain how the rest of the country is peaceful.

1 The link above is a copy preserved by the Italian paper.

Posted in War | 1 Comment

The curious authority of leaks

Claud Cockburn used to say that there are no real secrets. Anyone who spends a week reading all the available newspaers and talking to well-informed newspapers can figure out what the government is up to, and must be up to. The leak of today’s war memo in the Sunday Times is a case in point. In the summer of 1992 2002, it was obvious to any reader of the Daily Telegraph, the British mouthpiece of the neocons, that there would be a war and not hard to guess that Blair would go along with it. Now it turns out that the British government knew this too.

Posted in Journalism | 2 Comments

The bitterest man

in British politics today must be Ken Clarke. If he were leading the Conservatives, they’d very probably win ths election, and would certainly cripple Blair.

Posted in British politics | Comments Off on The bitterest man