Serious ethnographic note

The festival of diversity took place on a day when Trevor Phillips, who seems a very sharp cookie, was warning that there is a real danger of the emergence of a ghetto-ised and segregated underclass in this country, however much we may think of that as an American problem.

The evidence of the say suggests he’s right. We’re only about fifty miles from London — an hour from Victoria Station if you’re lucky with the tube change. Yet the reports about gun crime, or Polly Toynbee’s argument that

“Nationally 27% of people have no savings, not one penny; 25% of the poorest have at least £200 in debts … 12% of households (many more individuals) have no bank account”

might as well come from another country. I do know there are pockets of real poverty on the estates here, but nothing like half the children live under the poverty line, as they do in London.

All this happened almost imperceptibly. But it will be very hard to undo. Trevor Phillips suggests bussing — surely a counsel of despair. Polly says it would require only quite small redistributions of wealth to reverse. But quite small shifts in the tax burden have a way of growing at election time to intolerable proportions. It’s quite possible that wehave reverted to the two nations attitude that seemed natural in 1939, when Evelyn Waugh wrote a very funny squib about children being evacuated from London to the quiet countryside whose inhabitants would pay almost anything to have them billeted elsewhere. It took six years of real war to produce a government which would really exert itself to end this condition. Six more years of the “war on terror” are unlikely to have anything like that effect. In fact, if there is a war on terror here, it will be a civil war.

Posted in British politics | 3 Comments

Silly Ethnographic note

Yesterday was Uttlesford Council’s diversity day, with a fete in the grounds of Audley End house. There was a fair cord and I did see one black person there. Though there are four or five whom one sometimes sees shopping in this town, where 14,000 people live, the only really visible sign that anything has changed in the ethnic makeup of the area since about 1950 are three Indian restaurants, one Turkish, three Chinese, and a Thai place.

Everyone was given forms to fill out, specifying their ethnic origin; I don’t think the results will show much diverstity. But the funniest evidence of the whitebread character of the even came form the entertainments. There was a Bollywood dance troupe, which almost consisted of four Indian dancers in glorious silk dresses: except the second from the right was about nine inches taller than the other three, and white.

Then there was a full troupe of ethnic traditional dancers; about twelve, all in their native costumes, except for one small inauthentic point: you couldn’t help noticing that the men wore underpants (omitted in this shot for decency).

Scots Whae hae!

Posted in Blather | Comments Off on Silly Ethnographic note

Another end of privacy

An astonishing piece of research, found through Bruce Schneier which shows that a sound recording of a typist at work for fifteen minutes can be analysed to reveal almost every word they typed. The trick is that the keys on any keyboar make slightly different noises. You then analyse those noises by frequency (of occurrence not pitch) and that tells you roughly which pitch represents which letter. Then you have a transcript of everything typed. This has been done at Berkeley — but the really scary thing comes in the comments, where someone points out that an open skype connection — or any other voip — means that the bad guys don’t have to sneak in and plant a microphone. I suppose this is good news for spooks. Otherwise, I file it in the same drawer as “RNAi works on humans, too”

Posted in Net stories | Comments Off on Another end of privacy

Redesign thoughts

The new Guardian gets better as you go into it. Perhaps that’s another way of saying that it works better with fewer stories on the page. I hate the front. Making allowances for the fact that all readers hate all redesigns, I dislike the front. I think it’s just too cluttered, especially on the skyline and the new logo. Similarly, the news pages look short and tabloidy, though, of course, much better than the Times or even a properly done tabloid. But it’s a Monday, so the news pages would look odd anyway.

The first real winner is the double-page photo spread in the middle. That does everything we dreamt of on the Independent but at higher resolution and larger. From there on, the layout is a triumphant success: good looking, easy to manage, invitingly laid out, and with enough words on each page for thought. Media guardian hugely improved. Not sure about G2; haven’t really looked at it carefully except to notice that there seems to be no Doonesbury. This can’t be real.

UPDATE: Let freedom reign

I still think there’s too much noise and colour on the front page. But there almost always is when newspapers redesign, and it always takes about six weeks to shake down and for the subs to get the trick of laying ot a page that looks just right. So by Christmas we’ll have a much clearer idea of whether it succeeds aesthetically. Financially, I think it’s a sure bet. all colour advertising all through has got to be a mosntrous draw.

Posted in Journalism | 5 Comments

The best idea since Flickr

Librarything is a combination lookup tool for bibliographic information, a way to tag and catalogue your books collection, and a social service, where you can browse other people’s libraries. Type in a few identifying words from a book’s spine, and it will go off and find corresponding entries in the Library of Congress then add your selection to your library, with optional tags. these library collections are all public by default (though they can be private); if someone else has a book you own, you can copy it into your own library, saving more typing. I think this is just stupefying for anyone who needs to organise their bookshelves, and who likes other book lovers.

I’ve done a wormseye about it, which I will probably post later. But there’s some stuff I left out of that. There are a couple of web-based1 competitors — reader2, bibliophil, Alexandria. The last two seem to have rotted like most linux ideas; the first seems to me to be aimed at people who don’t read all that much. There’s a huge emphasis on the covers of books, and all the lookups are done from the Amazon catalogue, rather than the LoC.

Librarything uses Amazon as a fallback and (at my request) will also use the European amazons. But Spalding would rather use the British library, which has to be the right thing to do. From a cataloguing point of view, I really don’t care what the cover of the book looks like. The only useful service would be a picture of the spine, and no one provides that.

The service is free for up to 200 books (but, as he says, why would anyone want to catalogue so few) and $10 for any greater quantity. This is a lifetime fee. I think that’s a fantastic bargain. Even if the whole thing blows up and dies in a year’s time I can export all my records from it — and will, once they’re all entered. then I have paid $10 for a complete catalogue of my books that can by fed into any other database.

I do know about Delicious LIbrary. It is pure mac software: glossy and narcissistic. But it’s also more expensive, and lacks the social aspect. $40 is a perfectly reasonable price for thesoftware. But then you must add in the bar code reader, and the mac mini. That’s a lot of books foregone.

1 I know there are hundreds of programs that require you to type in all the details of books yourself. Forget them.

Posted in Net stories | 10 Comments

SmartassNerd help wanted

If anyone knows the code that will produce rss feeds of comment threads, will they make themselves known to the management? I really would like people to be able to subscribe to these, if they want to.

Posted in nördig | 4 Comments

With a preface by whom?

Is there anyone who can cast light on this entry from the Library of Congress catalogue?

Author: Dawkins, Richard, 1941-
Title: The selfish gene / Richard Dawkins ; with a pref. by Anaïs nin.
Published: New York : Oxford University Press, 1978, c1976.
Description: xi, 224 p. ; 20 cm.
LC Call No.: QH437.D38 1978
Dewey No.: 591.5
ISBN: 0195200004
Notes: Bibliography: p. [217]-220.
Includes index.
Subjects: Genetics.
Evolution (Biology)
Control No.: 1304324

I have absolutely no idea why she might have been asked to write a preface. There is the well-known business of Robert Trivers’ Foreword. But Anais Nin? Has someone pranked the LIbrary of Congress?

Posted in Literature | 2 Comments

How much was Bush to Blame? (2)

via John Naughton, I see that there’s a very lucid piece by Geoffrey Hodgson on OpenDemocracy.net arguing, as I did a couple of entries down, that we should blame the system for the failure of government, not just the Bushies.

Posted in Blather | Comments Off on How much was Bush to Blame? (2)

Good advice

No: better than that. The best advice you could ever give your children. (from Making light).

Posted in Literature | 1 Comment

Benny Morris

Oliver asked me to post the Benny Morris profile. It’s here, as a PDF.

Posted in Journalism | 2 Comments