Google desktop search is obviously wonderful. “Google for the hard disk” is something one has wanted for years. But it’s not wonderful enough to get me using IE, which is the only browser it works with at present. I’m rather shocked by that. You’d have thought that riffling through the cache of a web browser was something that would work with any browser’s cache, not just IE’s.
Anyone who uses OOo is used to the fact that disk indexers generally ignore it, so I’m not offended that Google does. In any case, I have just discovered Docsearcher, which indexes OOo (and PDF, and MS Office, HTML and plaiin text) just fine. It’s free, open-source (Java, Lucence and stuff); it’s fast and not too fiddly to set up.
So there is nothing that the Google desktop offers I can’t already kludge. I don’t have docsearch index my Opera cache, but that’s because I only just thought of it. Of course it’s uglier and less convenient in some ways, but using Internet Explorer and/or Outlook condemns you to greater ugliness and inconvenience still.
The next question is how far back does one want the browser history indexed? I could copy the cache automatically to an indexable disk every evening. But how soon would that disk run out? And how many duplicates would I get? Deep dark matters.
In the meantime, I try to imagine what features Google could offer to make it worth my while to use IE and Outlook. The best I can come up with is a helper bar for online Poker rooms that would show the content of everyone else’s hand. This must be easier if all the other players are using IE.