Not evil not good enough

Google desktop search is obviously wonderful. “Google for the hard disk” is something one has wanted for years. But it’s not wonderful enough to get me using IE, which is the only browser it works with at present. I’m rather shocked by that. You’d have thought that riffling through the cache of a web browser was something that would work with any browser’s cache, not just IE’s.

Anyone who uses OOo is used to the fact that disk indexers generally ignore it, so I’m not offended that Google does. In any case, I have just discovered Docsearcher, which indexes OOo (and PDF, and MS Office, HTML and plaiin text) just fine. It’s free, open-source (Java, Lucence and stuff); it’s fast and not too fiddly to set up.

So there is nothing that the Google desktop offers I can’t already kludge. I don’t have docsearch index my Opera cache, but that’s because I only just thought of it. Of course it’s uglier and less convenient in some ways, but using Internet Explorer and/or Outlook condemns you to greater ugliness and inconvenience still.

The next question is how far back does one want the browser history indexed? I could copy the cache automatically to an indexable disk every evening. But how soon would that disk run out? And how many duplicates would I get? Deep dark matters.

In the meantime, I try to imagine what features Google could offer to make it worth my while to use IE and Outlook. The best I can come up with is a helper bar for online Poker rooms that would show the content of everyone else’s hand. This must be easier if all the other players are using IE.

Posted in Software | 6 Comments

Torture update

According to the Washington Post the proposal has been dropped, and replaced by one which would allow suspects to be detained indefinitely, without trial, at the whim of the immigration authorities.

According to the official site the amendment passed on a voice vote. So all of the screaming was worth it. The cockroaches scuttled when the light was turned on.

Where have we reached, where this is a victory? Is there any Republican in congress today who could, with a straight face, read out these sentences? We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men” The italics are mine.

I can’t resist adding one marvellous amendment which was accepted: “An amendment numbered five printed in House Report 108-751 to establish a ‘zero tolerance’ policy towards the unlawful importation, possession, or transfer of shoulder fired guided missiles (MANPADS), atomic weapons, dirty bombs, and variola (smallpox) virus by making their unauthorized possession a federal crime carrying stiff mandatory penalties.”

I know the gun control laws are a little lax, but was it really legal up till now for private citizens to possess atomic weapons?

Posted in War | Comments Off on Torture update

Emmanuel Todd on Israel & the USA

This is an argument both sinister and persuasive. In essence, he says that Israel once attracted the Left because of its egalitarian ideals. Now it is attractive to the right precisely because it seems to have become a militarist, aggressive and deeply stratified society.

It’s hard to dismiss this entirely. There was a piece that Tim Garton Ash wrote almost immediately after 9/11 which said that America had a choice between a liberal and a Likudnik response, and mentioned the unpleasant attraction that the rhetoric, and the methods of the Likud have to a certain kind of Republican. They like the bully. They like the swagger.

The key quote may be this:

The recent general fixation of the United States on Israel does not seem to have much to do with this original religious affinity,a love for the Bible, or with a positive and optimistic identification with the chosen people of Israel. I am convinced that if republican or Catholic France were still at war with Algeria — repressing, interning, and killing Arabs as the state of Israel is doing in Palestine –today’s United States, differentialist, inegalitarian, and wracked by its own bad conscience–would side with this colonial France that had abandoned its universalism. There is nothing more reassuring for those who have given up on justice than to see others behaving unjustly.

But there is a lot of detailed argument, which I will stick below the fold. To understand it, you must know that Todd makes a huge distinction, based partly on traditional family structures, between universalist and hierarchical societies. The Anglo-Saxons, he thinks, are somewhere in the middle. They believe that there are some fully human beings, with equal rights, surrounded by a periphery of others. In an American context, the definition of “fully human” fluctuates; and they are always defined with reference to an outgroup. Thus, Catholics, and later Jews, both of whom were once clearly dangerous aliens, could eventually be assimilated because they were not, i the last analysis, Black. “The hypothesis of a general ebbing of universalism in America would explain the persistence of Jewish anxiety — What if my integration is revoked?”

In this context, would Todd be judged in America as fully human (he is Jewish) or not (he is French)? You decide.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Emmanuel Todd on Israel & the USA

Torture: they’ll say anything

The torture bill referred to in yesterday’s post is still going to congress. One of the Presiden’t lawyers, Alberto Gonzalez, wrote to the Washington Post denying that Bush wanted torture legaised:

The president did not propose and does not support this provision. He has made clear that the United States stands against and will not tolerate torture and that the United States remains committed to complying with its obligations under the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Consistent with that treaty, the United States does not expel, return or extradite individuals to countries where the United States believes it is likely that they will be tortured.

In case you are tempted to believe a word of this disclaimer, remember at Mr Gonzalez has previous form. On Jan 25, 2002, he advised Bush, contra Colin Powell, that the Taliban and Al-Qaeda prisoners were not subject to the procetions of the Geneva Conventions — ie that they might be tortured. “In my judgement”, he then wrote, “the new paradigm” (love that paradigm) “renders obsolete Geneva’s strict limitations on the questioning of enemy prisoners, and renders quaint some of its provisions.”

Perhaps the most sinister aspect of the whole story is the reports that leading Democrats believe these clauses were inserted as something they could not vote against without appearing “soft on terror”. This would mean that the Republicans believe that torture wins votes.

Posted in War | 2 Comments

outsourcing torture

I don’t normally do this, and perhaps I should, but here’s the week’s wormesye. It matters.

Posted in War | Comments Off on outsourcing torture

IP as imperial taxation

I am reading Emmanuel Todd’s After the Empire, which talks about the increasing fragility of the American hegemony. This isn’t entirely new territory — think of Paul Kennedy — but it’s covered with elegance, insight, and a clear grasp of demographics and economy. As a further advantage, Todd is a philo-American and conscious that the American hegemony was almost entirely beneficial for the world for many decades.

Continue reading

Posted in War | 1 Comment

Praying to scorpions

Martin Kozloff is a Professor of Education at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington; amongst other things, he teaches a course in Classroom management for the mildly handicapped. How would he teach, I wonder, a student who got up in class and announced

One day soon, our planes and missiles will begin turning your mosques, your madrasses, your hotels, your government offices, your hideouts, and your neighborhoods into rubble.

And then our soldiers will enter your cities and begin the work of killing you, roaches, as you crawl from the debris.

As cowards, you will have your hands in the air and you will get on your knees begging for mercy. And we will instead give you justice. Your actions and your words long ago placed you far from any considerations of mercy. You are not men.

And if you come to this country and harm a child, shoot a mother, hijack a bus, or bomb a mall, we will do what we did in 1775. Millions of us will form militias.

We will burn your mosques.

We will invade the offices of pro-arab-muslim organizations, destroy them, and drag their officers outside.

We will tell the chancellors of universities either to muzzle or remove anti American professors, whose hatred for their own country we have tolerated only
because we place a higher value on freedom of speech. But we will no longer tolerate treason. We will muzzle and remove them.

We will transport arab-muslims to our deserts, where they can pray to scorpions under the blazing sun.

Professor Kolzoff could only blush prettily and wipe the spittle moisture from his cheeks, because he is the author. The whole rant is listed on his website under “Recent Papers” with a note saying “Warning. Provocative language. I do NOT advocate violence against any persons or groups.” So that’s all right then.

Posted in War | 3 Comments

Crime and error

Somone — Tony Howard, I think — wrote the other day that he had never understood Talleyrand’s saying that something was “worse than a crime: it was a mistake.” I think the difference is this. A crime is something for which you can later make reparation. A mistake, in Talleyrand’s sense, robs you even of the power to make amends.

Posted in Blather | 1 Comment

Deux doigts

élevés à la presse de l’université d’Oxford, se trouvent ici.

A fine companion site to the German-English dictionary that lives in my sidebar.

Posted in Travel notes | Comments Off on Deux doigts

A whole other question

Steve Bell’s cartoon on Tuesday showed Tony Blair singing a version of “my Way” which rose to the final line “I gave Bush Myyyyyy ass.” This raised
an important question of principle. Why not “arse?”. Tony Blair is a British Prime Minister. When he was a boy, he had a bottom. When he grew up, he
acquired an Arse; not, as an American would, an “ass”. An Arse is one of the distinguishing marks of an Englishman. Has Blair’s mysteriously
changed nationality as a mark of presidential favour, or is there some more subtle semantic point at issue?

Sometimes the American and English spellings make useful distinctions of meaning. It’s obvious that Radio 3 makes programmes, whereas computers run
programs.

With “arse” and “ass” the distinction also seems clear. An arse is an essentially comic organ, wholly devoid of dignity. It is something to be
kicked, or to land with a bump on. At a pinch, soldiers can do something at “split-arse speed”, as Bill Deedes regiment planned to do in the war.
But even here, there connotations are of undignified haste.

An “ass” is an organ with a much wider range of uses. It can flatter, for one thing. A person may have “a great ass” and be complemented by this. “A
great ass”, in English, is an old-fashioned idiot. “A great arse” is an Anglo-Saxon term, meaning a large bum.

In American, a great “ass” is not just a beautiful body part. It expresses the inner beauty of its owner. An “arse” is always at most a part of the
body. If we want to express an opinion of the whole man, we have to say he’s an “arsehole”. But your “ass” is a much more comprehensive organ, and
almost always a synecdoche for the whole American.

When Americans get their “asses” in gear, or have them put in a sling, this is no mere posterior accident. It is a life-changing event. If an
Englishman is trying to escape form a sticky situation, and gets to the point where his arse is out of there, it means he’s stuck half-way through
the window. An American, with his ass out of there, is away and running free.

The only time that “ass” is used in an English, anatomical sense, the connotations are not comical but humiliating. To own someone’s ass has
unmistakable overtones of prison rape — a crime which occupies an extraordinarily prominent place in the American imagination, as if all
relationships of power could be reduced to this one act. This proves, I think, that Steve Bell knew exactly which of “ass” and “arse” was, in the
circumstances, the mot juste.

Posted in Travel notes | 1 Comment