The Onion

Does something like justice to Iraq.

Posted in Net stories | Comments Off on The Onion

sorsele sunset

I’ve been flickr-ing what I was up to. I still can’t really believe I saw this

Posted in Travel notes | 1 Comment

This is really strange

Looking at Tony Howard’s piece on women bishops in the Times today, I noticed a rack of google ads down one side. This was the bottom one ….

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on This is really strange

Something completely different

If you have a fast PC and have not yet played with Google Earth you are missing something astonishing. It has to be a PC, I’m afraid: there’s client software to download.

Essentially it is a set of satellite maps of earth, centrally served (You’ll need broadband, oops) and zoomable to various levels of detail. The highest level is astonishing. Not only could I pick out the exact hotel where I stayed in Cambridge in May, in Harvard Square I can distinguish individual people standing on the individually distinguishable steps down to the subway.

Even the next-highest level of detail, which covers London and parts of England, is phenomenal. I can see my own car outside my own house and my mother’s outside hers. I can trace (and measure) all my normal walks.

The next level is too blurry to distinguish individual houses or cars, but the overlay of roads on the countryside allows you to see where they are. In this way I am able to spot the house in the woods where I lived for three years in Sweden, and the farm where I will be this time next week.

What’s the use, apart from fun? There are all the usual overlays, showing where shops and banks and hotels and petrol stations ought to be, with all the usual biases towards the USA. But at the high resolution, it’s better than that. I can mark the pools that hold individual trout on the Cam. My friend Sean says this could ruin wild fishing in New Zealand. But I think it will be a while before that is mapped at the same resolution as Essex. Even in Montana, the rivers are a bit blurry for that sort of game. But, since I know so well the lakes I used to fish, I can pinpoint the bay where I caught my first ever trout on a fly.

Posted in nördig | 2 Comments

Gloomy thoughts

It’s true as well as inspiring to say that London is a great, multicultural city and will recover from this. It has the traditions of resilience, tolerance, and diversity. But that’s not so true of England as a whole, and especially not of some of the places with large Muslim populations. Imagine the effects of bombs in Burnley, or Bradford.

Continue reading

Posted in War | 1 Comment

thought passing through

Is anyone reading this in Stockholm? I will be passing through on Wednesday evening, with six hours to kill before the night train to

Posted in Travel notes | Comments Off on thought passing through

Bomb Thoughts

Are up at Salon if anyone’s interested. Not very coherent, but not notably wrong, either. I do wish I had been closer to the action. I know it sounds callous, but that’s what journalists do. I want to see, not watch things on television.

I note that Salon, just as much as everyone else, immediately fitted the bombs into their preferred narrative: in their case, that warmongers will be punished by the peace-loving electorate for their crimes.1 I don’t think that’s going to happen. Even if it did, I don’t think it would diminish our danger much. Though it is true that there are now far more and better-trained terrorists than if we had not invaded Iraq, it doesn’t follow that there will be fewer if we pull out. It may just encourage them.

1 Dr Baber, who should know better, said much the same. But if Blair is replaced, it won’t be by an anti-war leader. We’re too far in for that.

Posted in Journalism | 1 Comment

The metabolic power of the sacred

Possibly also classed under patriotism. God knows the British press is dreadful at times. But I don’t think that even the Daily Mail could publish this particular flavour of crap. If it could, surely someone there would have been sacked for failing to do so already.

Posted in Journalism | 1 Comment

Easter Island

Here we come! I read stories like this, and for the first time in my life I wonder whether it was fair to have children. But perhaps that’s just wimpish. If billions of people are going to die anyway, why shouldn’t some of them be my descendants?

Posted in Science without worms | 2 Comments

vulgar anti-darwinism

If one function of theological opinion is to generate heresy, as I believe it is, so that our team is distinct from their team and any fight over resources more likely to have a decisive outcome, then this would tend to explain one puzzling feture of American creationism — the belief that Darwinism, or evolution undercuts morality.

As a matter of empirical truth, it’s obvious that people who believe in evolution are not notably less moral than those who don’t. It’s also a matter of historical record that evolutionary rhetoric has been used to justify things that were as nasty as crusades.

So the people who claim that Darwinism undercuts morality are not trying to say something factual about the real world. What they’re really claiming is that evolutionists are outside the moral community. They’re not properly human.

This makes perfect sense if moral sentiment arises from networks of reciprocal obligation within small groups. It’s just not very cheering sense. We all know, if we read the Bible, what God wants done to outsiders. The enormous creative accomolishment of Christianity was to redefine the boundaries between inside and outside, and to allow for the possibility of conversion. bu the boundary was not abolished, and conversion can go in both directions. You can be changed into an outsider.

Posted in God | 3 Comments