Still not here

But there are photos here

I haven’t forgotten this place, but my internet connecitons are just too intermittent on this journey for me to try to blog. Still, this morning, I have been away from home for three weeks. In three weeks’ time I will be back. I have so far reached Gällivare, and will shortly set off for the most northerly co-op shop in Sweden (It occurs to me that Tromsö is probably even further north, otherwise I would have written “in the world”).

There are getting on for 30,000 words of notes from the journey so far. I thnk this might be a worthwhile book, if I can mae the next three weeks as productive.

In the meantime, if anyone wants to contact me, the best way is to ring +46-709-84-89-70

Posted in Housekeeping | 2 Comments

Hiatus

I’m off on a journey tomorrow, and, while I may be blogging from it, it’s just as likely that I won’t be. I certainly hope to pass much of the time right off line. So expect no postings. I may shut down the comments entirely if I check and find there’s too much spam.

Since you asked, I hope to reach Pajala. It’s a long way to drive.

Update 23/6/06 : yes, it is a long way to drive

Posted in Housekeeping | 2 Comments

USB drives: a handy trick

I bought a freecom USB hard drive, on sale at Morgan Computer for £70 to have backups of everything while I was away (and most of my music collection, for later transfer to the Zen micro). It would not work in either of the computers here. I took it back; it worked in the shop, on their computers. On mine it showed up as a connected USB device, but not as a disk drive.

Then I discovered that my little memory stick wasn’t recognised as a disk drive either. This is known good and has worked for years on the other laptop. So it had to be a flaw in the computer. To cut a long google short, there was a confusion of drive letters in the logical drive manager because I have masses of network drives mapped as letters. Assigning the USB drive to something high and unused made it show up at once as a proper disk drive. I offer this tip for the eye of Google, and assistance of passers by.

Posted in nördig | Comments Off on USB drives: a handy trick

The long war

I know I keep linking to the Telegraph but it is much the best source for the way that the British Army is thinking — and, in other parts, for the rather different ways that the neocons used to think. Less of that nowadays, of course. In any case, there was a fascinating piece earlier this week showing that the Army now sees its future as a mercenary force for the Americans as a defence against the depradations of the Treasury.

The news of another four years will come as no surprise to military chiefs, who have been quietly planning to be in Iraq until 2010. While Tony Blair has trumpeted troop withdrawals over the past year, defence chiefs have known that a sizeable force will have to remain to support the Iraqi army in its infancy.
Without that backing, the British-trained 8,000-strong Iraqi 10th Division would probably unravel, undoing all the investment of lives and dangerous work of the past three years.

Although American planners in Baghdad are said to be detailing a structured timetable of withdrawal – possibly at moments that could prove helpful to the White House – the British presence will gradually draw down in battle-group size chunks of 800 men every Telic. [year]
By 2010 the force in Iraq – about 3,500 – will equal that of Britain’s deployment in Afghanistan, giving the military two fronts on which to sharpen its professional skills for the next conflict.

(My italics at the end). One thing to note is the colonial roots of the Army coming out: the assumption that we can’t leave these people on their own. But more interesting to me is the idea that wars are their own justification. There is a perfectly good conservative argument, made, by Matthew Parris and Simon Jenkins at various times, which says that we have no business whatever in Afghanistan. It’s certainly not clear that the Iraqi government will never turn around in the next four years and tell us to bugger off. They may do this whether or not their army ca stand by itself.

In any case, the implication of Harding’s piece is that there are people in our Army who think that it is a full and conclusive answer to the question “What do we need an army for?” to say “to fight this war” as if the follow-up “And why do we need to fight this war?” were quite unaskable. These generals are not fools. they may very well be right in their reading of the political logic. I, personally, am very glad that we have an excellent army and don’t want it shrunk. But is is remarkable that the argument works.

Posted in War | Comments Off on The long war

A restless caterpillar

Also preparing for a journey; even if his will require utter stillness for three weeks.

caterpillar

Posted in Pictures | Comments Off on A restless caterpillar

“Once upon a Time” in Japanese

An unexpected heavy parcel today contained five copies of the Worm book translated into Japanese. I had entirely forgotten this was going to happen. Here. in celebration, is some of the opening sentence. I have long been proud of writing the only pop science book that starts “once upon a time” and now I know, I hope, what the phrase looks like in Japanese.
Posted in Worms | 3 Comments

Don’t mention the War (Telegraph Edition)

It really is remarkable how thoroughly the Telegraph has abandoned its support for the war. This must reflect a deeper disillusion within the British Army. There are two small items today which are very telling. One if the readers’ poll on the web site about whether the British Army should be withdrawn — not a question you ask if you are sure of the answer.

More telling, though, is an observation about Blair’s visit I saw in no other paper, still less on the front page.

Mr Blair’s visit – only his second to the Iraqi capital – was cloaked in secrecy amid fears of a possible attack and no news of the visit was broadcast until he had landed in the Green Zone.
Members of the honour guard lining up along the red carpet were patted down by fellow Iraqi security officials before Mr Blair and President Jalal Talabani reviewed the men who are supposed to secure the future of Iraq.
This appeared to be an attempt to avoid an assassination of the kind that killed Egypt’s president Anwar Sadat during a military parade in 1981, when a soldier opened fire on the review stand.

Perhaps the people saying we must stay are right: an army where the guard of honour has to be searched before it can be let near the Prime Minister is not quite ready for democracy …

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on Don’t mention the War (Telegraph Edition)

Multicultural Melanie

Reading Melanie Phillips denouncing multiculturalism in the LA Times, an irony occurs to me. Her stuff falls into a very familiar category of bad foreign correspondence: it sounds perfectly credible unless you actually live in the country concerned or speak the language. There is obviously a market in the USA at the moment for Europeans prepared to denounce Europe as weak, spineless, appeasing, practically occupied by the Muslim hordes already. It is an explanation for what is happening that has the merit of casting America as uniquely virtuous.

There’s nothing new about this, of course. Flattering the imperial power is a time-honoured and often successful strategy. It suits both sides. In fact, our rule in India depended on this mechanism, which evolved, over time, into the idea that religious comunities should police themselves and produce their own leaders (dependent, of course, on our favour) to run themselves. This was the matrix from which “multiculturalism” in Britain evolved, and the people most loudly denouncing it in the American newspapers stand, in relation to their American paymasters, exactly as the multicultural specialists like the Muslim Council of Britain stand in relation to the Blair government.

The analogy gets richer than that. It has clearly been the aim of Amercan, and in British terms Atlanticist, foreign policy for the last fifty or so years to weaken the Europen Union and prevent the emergence of anything like a federal states of Europe. Again, this is hardly new. It’s called “divide and rule”. It’s what empires do. So the denunciations of the Dutch, Germans, French, etc as appeasing traitors to civilisation are not in any significant way different to the denunciations that you get from one Muslim sect of all the other ones as “not really Islamic” and so on and so forth. Just as some forms of multi-culturalism within Britain promote distrust and disharmony between communities, which in turn increases the importance of the “community leaders”, so do people like Phillips, and, presumably, AHA, increase their own importance and power in America by making Europe a slightly worse place for everyone else who has to live in it.

Actually, I am ambivalent about Melanie Phillips. If she could inhale without outrage, and exhale without hyperbole, I would listen a lot more. But then, I suppose, she would be poor and obscure.

Posted in Journalism | 6 Comments

Consciousness nearly explained

Anyone interested in the scientific study of consciousness should read Nick Humphrey’s most recent lectures, Seeing Red, and perhaps the piece he had in a fairly recent JCS Solving the Mind Body Problem.

I’m not sure that he’s right in his explanation of where consciousness came from and what it does — in fact I feel sure that he is wrong — but what’s interesting in this context is that his belief that the fitness-enhancing role of human consciousness is essentially that it makes life more interesting entirely expresses his (admirably) optimistic and can-do temperament. My own doubts no doubt express a similarly temperamental rancidity. But it is surely true that any historical explanation of human consciousness must satisfy all sorts of unconscious criteria as well as all the obvious rational ones.

There is another essay to be written on the selectionist attitudes that flicker in and out of his papers. But I doubt I will write it this summer. I have to read an enormous amount of Swedish detective stories in the next six weeks.

Posted in Science without worms | 1 Comment

work, travel

Sorry that there have been so few entries on here recently. I am off to Sweden for six weeks in a week’s time, and falling behind with work, In particular, I had to do an interview/profile of Nick Humphrey over the weekend, which was interesting and fun, and am currently preparing an interview with Slavoj Zizek on Friday, which is different.

This involves reading, at the very least, his latest book, and the earlier Conversations with Zizek, from which I can report that by page 77 I have stopped even asking whether what I read is bullshit; I have stopped reading with an eye for answers or reasons or arguments to make. No, I have passed into a state where mere bullshit becomes the negation of bullshit, where pseudery is ultimately the anti-pseud; a state to which the only analogy is the Toronto Blessing. Again and again I find warm billows of laughter shake me in my chair as I read. Do they make sense? Are they an adequate response? What very tediously empirical questions.

I hope to scan in later some of the passages that have reduced — which is to say enlarged — me to this state.

Posted in Journalism | 1 Comment