Six million degrees of separation

Transcribing the Benny Morris interview, I stumble over a name. It is “Henry ?Pullen”, a Cambridge historian, under whom he did a PhD. So to Google, where eventually the name of Henry Pelling turns up in the context of a Spectator review of Churchill biographies. It just doesn’t look like the Spectator’s web site; and after a few minutes, I realise that I am in fact on David Irving’s site, where he has reproduced the review because it quoted the judge’s demolition of his character in the Lipstadt trial. ewww.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Six million degrees of separation

A small Jerusalem statistic

The Moment café on Gaza Street in Jerusalem serves very good sandwiches. I know because I ate there twice, appreciating also the fact that it was never in the least bit crowded. At least before nine I never saw more than about 20 people there. One reason emerges from a quick google: in the evening of Saturday 27th Feb last year, there were at least 63 people there, because 11 of them were killed and 52 injured when a suicide bomber went off by the door.

Posted in Travel notes | Comments Off on A small Jerusalem statistic

A techie question

I have had to re-reconfigure the wireless network on my return from Jerusalem, since the hotel I was in didn’t use any WEP encryption on their network. I can never remember how to generate a WEP key and there seems to be no way to save it when I switch the encryption off. So I switched off all WEP encryption back here and simply locked down the router so that only the card in the laptop could access it. Is this really secure? In one sense, I know it is, since it would be a very lucky hacker indeed who found a parking place in range of my network. But I assume that if you had a sniffer and a parking place, you could now eavesdrop on my network, even if you couldn’t get access to the internet from there.

Posted in Software | 3 Comments

Examines self for anti-Semitism

I must have been sixteen before I knew I knew anyone Jewish. My parents were warmly pro-Israel: there is a family legend that in May 1967, my mother drove into the back of a Stockholm tram while distracted with worry over the Six Day War. But they had few close friends, and none that I know of were Jewish.

At the time of my mother’s car crash I was twelve, away at a school in England, where there must have been a number of Jews : I see from Friends Reunited that there was someone in the year below me called “Lionel Stanbrook”, but Jewishness was a quite invisibly trivial property there; at the Dragon School anti-semitism would have been like prejudice against freckled people.

Later, at Marlborough, a school founded for the sons of the clergy, there were traces of the traditional, Buchanesque anti-Semitism of the British upper classes. Some people would use “to Jew” as a verb, meaning to bargain successfully, as in “I Jewed him down”, but Jews were only a minor subdivision of the undesirables and I don’t remember anyone explicitly known as Jewish or as obnoxious for that reason. Jewishness may have been a misfortune, but it was not on its own sufficient grounds for pariah status. Compared with homosexuality, an offence defined as masturbating less often than your peers, Jewish blood was trivial; the division that mattered was between people who acted like ghetto Jews and people who acted like Israeli paratroops (whose victims were of course the ghetto types).

Because of this, I felt at times very strongly that I should have been a Jew, in the tortured ghetto intellectual sense, and that it was just one more manifestation of Life’s Unspeakable Unfairness that I was a protestant Irishman with a naturally healthy complexion.

At Bedales, which I briefly attended when I was sixteen, there were self-identified Jews all over the place, but they didn’t form the aristocracy of the school; some were in the circle of ultimate chic, but not because they were Jewish, and the people I remember as setting the tone were the children of the Gentile establishment: Tomàs Graves, Jeremy Mortimer; Polly Fisher, who glamorously lived with him in a cottage outside the school grounds; Tamasin and Dan Day Lewis. Carlo Geblér. Does he count as Jewish? I think his father was. In any case, I hated him, because he was confident and fashionable and accomplished and I wasn’t. This all seems very silly now. If I’d thought he was Jewish, I would probably have hated him more, but only because it would have been one more social advantage, like having parents who were divorced.

Then I got thrown out and went away to lose a few years, smoking dope or wishing that I was doing so. My thoughts about the Jewish question did not much extend beyond the continued unfairness of my not being Leonard Cohen, or, indeed, Arthur Koestler, who seemed to me the perfect model of an intellectual.

Anitha, my Swedish wife, had actually worked on a Kibbutz, as a sixteen-year-old volunteer. She didn’t talk about it much, but took away a lasting dislike of the kibbutzim. The men, she said were arrogant sexual predators, who despised anyone who hadn’t killed an Arab. The women regarded the female volunteers with a mixture of jealousy and contempt.

Ten or twelve years after leaving school, when I came back to London as a journalist and part-time policy wonk, I found myself in a hugely Jewish world, but these were people who were all Jew-ish in the sense of the Jonathan Miller joke. This was especially true of the people regarded as Conservative intellectuals. With the exception of Charles Moore, all the cleverest young Thatcherite intellectuals whom I knew seem to have been Jewish. The two most admired were Oliver Letwin and Dominic Lawson; the Centre for Policy Studies, for whom I wrote a pamphlet, was founded by Keith Joseph, and had as its resident malevolence Alfred Sherman. The Spectator, where I worked, was traditionally anti-Zionist, but it wasn’t in the least bit anti-Semitic.

The one thing that none of these people were, nor could be imagined being, was religious. I did not meet any religious Jews until I went to work for the Independent, sixteen years ago, and sometimes I think I am still getting over the shock.

(to be continued).

Posted in Blather | 1 Comment

A postcard from Jerusalem

Mass tourism is pretty horrible. But to see a city where tourism has died off is ghastly. Of course, it looks absurd to come to Jerusalem and see the city’s problems as primarily touristic, but I’m not sure that the absurdity is more than superficial. This is a place which has no intrinsic economic value. It survives, as cities always have, because people come in from the hinterland bringing food and money and for trade. But no one now wants to come to Jerusalem from anywhere, except for people whom the army would rather keep out.

The modern city is almost surreally boring, except that people keep getting murdered here. To meet Benny Morris in his favourite café, I walked down a quiet, residential street where a bus blew up less than a month ago: a flower shop owner saw two human heads fall to the ground in front of him “like chickens’ heads”. The cafe where I ate supper had been the victim of another suicide bomber earlier.

None of it is architecturally distinguished. There is a very funny YMCA with an enormous phallic tower, erected by the British in the Thirties. Presumably that’s the one they wrote the song about. But all the really interesting bits are in the old walled city, half a mile’s walk from here, and that’s there the devastation is most notable.

In the old city there are parts where you’re afraid to have a pocket open, still less walk with a freely dangling camera; in the parts where cameras won’t be grabbed, people look down twice, fast, inconspicuously, at any shiny metal object in your hand. And I really wouldn’t want to fumble with a backpack here in front of an army patrol. So the shops, are empty; the Jaffa Gate has a few listlessly begging tour guides. I know I ought to hire one, but I hate that. I like to see and feel and drift and smell things on my own. You can’t, though, drift. Anyone who seems to be considering anything, whether a view, an artefact, or even an idea, is immediately pestered. Walk briskly, watch from the sides of your eyes. Watch the way the Arabs watch the Jews after they walk past. Watch two skull-capped swaggering students in the middle of the street; watch the patrols with their drawn, excited faces.

This is the second pilgrimage town that I have wandered when it has been emptied by a war. I was incongruously reminded of the main street in Medjugorje, where barns full of unsold rosaries and statuettes of the Virgin lined the way to the church and the Croat kids had icons of the BVM on their gun butts. Here not all the tat was religious. Lots was politically touristical. There was one “Visit Palestine” banner that I saw, lots of assorted Christian souvenirs — icons, crosses, and olivewood statuettes, and, on corner stalls, Israeli souvenirs — T shirts and so forth. The demon of bad taste who works overtime when I am stressed thought suddenly of a T shirt — “My sister went to Israel and all that came back was this bloody T shirt”.

Damian Thompson had told me to look into the Messianic bookshop by the Jaffa Gate. It was not nearly as crazy as I had hoped, but there was one blonde Brasilian Messianic Jewish woman giving her testimony in French to the luminously thin and bearded guy behind the counter. His French was fairly poor — she seemed to think the details of her story mattered — so I ended up translating for them. I suppose the details must have mattered, since they are the only thing that changes in these testimonies. Someone, somewhere, was going to get saved. The only question was who, and where. This happened n Brazil, where her grandmother had been spared to live to 94. She had been very ill, aged 80: the mystified doctors had given up on her, but the blonde, then eleven, had persuaded her to accept Jesus (in writing, both for solemnity and not to shock the family) and she had been spared. Later, when she was seventeen, Jesus had told her to announce to her family that she was a Christian, and now he had told her to come here. They thanked her with real warmth when I stumbled to the end.

The covered markets of the Arab quarter smelled of cumin, nuts, grilled meat, and the dust of carpets which had hung unsold for years; old women sat on the ground with bunches of spring onions and coriander to sell; whole carcasses of sheep or goat hung in the butchers’, their pink haunches webbed with white fat. I don’t know quite where I was there. I had bought a map, but didn’t stop to read it; here, and here only, there was a constant traffic of people, walking both ways, quiet, politely jostling. I had a moment of fear when I spotted three burly youths walking tight behind me, and when the alley opened into a crowded, rising square, I turned around and walked back the way I had come before cutting up the via dolorosa, which was narrow and empty where you would expect pilgrims to throng. On a historical note, I have always been puzzled by the crusader boast that the blood ran above their ankles when they took the city. But it’s all built on intersecting hillsides. There’d have been a current in the gutters running down from the Jewish quarter.

Ah, the Jewish quarter of the Old City — this morning it smelt of soap running down the gutter in the sunlight. The streets seemed wider, and the buildings, though built of the same dull pale beige stone as the rest of Jerusalem, seemed lighter and brighter. There was even one group of tourists, being lectured in an underground museum in English.

Up the hill, I came on the Armenian quarter, marked with posters commemorating the genocide of 1915; someone had written a phone number and a message across Cilicia, in a script I couldn’t read.

Outside the Arab quarter the whole place was extraordinarily quiet. Even the soldiers wore rubber-soled boots, and no one seemed to talk at all, except the hawkers. But on the sunlit walls, suddenly trilling like car alarms, small brightly coloured birds were hung in cages outside shops. In the shop where I bought my map, the owner had two small cages on the counter. One of them had been partitioned with a sheet of corrugated plastic separating two caged birds into even smaller cages. The symbolism was so obvious as to be irresistible, and I asked his permission to photograph them, but when I looked at the photo back in my room, it was the owner’s expression as he leant against the wall in the background which dominated the photo, and the only way to make sense of it was to crop so that only one bird was in the picture.

So, here is a man waiting for the tourists to return. It’s been four years since they went away.

Waiting for the tourists, the old city, Jerusalem

Posted in Travel notes | 3 Comments

gone again

I’m off to Israel until Sunday, so there may be no posts till then. It all depends on business and connectivity.

Posted in Travel notes | Comments Off on gone again

renaissance art

The textbooks will tell you that the painters of the renaissance had mastered naturalistic representations of the human form. So what is this woman doing in the fresco’ed roof of the collonade of palazzo Santini in Lucca?

artishoke tits.jpg
There is an even odder sphinx there, which may well be the real reason Oedipus went blind.

Posted in Travel notes | Comments Off on renaissance art

No: it is a tragedy

Melanie Phillips has an agonised article in Prospect that makes me think better of her. At the same time, it bodes very badly for the future of Israel. She visited the country on a government-sponsored freebie: she got to talk freely to lots of important people. Why not? She is, as the standfirst describes her, “an ardent supporter of Israel” — one of the most eloquent in the British press. And she concludes that unilateral, immediate withdrawal from the Occupied Territories is all that can save the country now.

For a start, she sees that the occupation of the territories is not going to work.

“Israel appears to be caught in a deadly trap. It tried negotiations; these led to violence. It tried armed self-defence; this has not stopped the violence. It has retreated from Palestinian cities; this has increased the violence. Some likudniks don’t accept they are trapped. The line, at least until Sharon’s recent talk of disengagement, is that they are on course for victory. ‘We are winning, because the Palestinians are a bunch of losers’, said an official. This was not only unpleasant, but surely wrong.”

Beyond that, there is the demographic fear.

“If Israel continues to hold the territories, with a few years, there will be more Arabs than Jews between the river Jordan and the mediterranean. No matter that most of these Palestinians will be outside Israel’s borders; if Israel continues to rule arabs who outnumber Jews, the momentum for one person, one vote will become unstoppable. If Israel granted it, it would be the end of the Jewish state. If it did not, it would not only become a true pariah in the world but would cause a devastating implosion within the collective Jewish conscience.”

So she finds people both on Left and Right, who believe that Israel is compelled by its own self-interest to do the right thing. But the fact remains that the Palestinians still hate them, and want them all gone. Israel is not going to feel safe within its own borders, not even possessing nuclear, chemical and bacteriological deterrents along with a formidable army. So what is the answer suggested to Melanie Phillips by a senior member of Ehud Barak’s negotiating team? “Sher’s answer is that withdrawal should be accompanied by a commitment from the Americans to take responsibility for guaranteeing security in the territories.”

Right. Just as the American policy in Iraq has become bipartisan and clear — declare democracy and get the hell out — smart and influential Israelis suppose that they can get American troops to garrison the West Bank for them if they pull their own troops back. No. It really isn’t funny.

Posted in War | Comments Off on No: it is a tragedy

time and motion

OK. I got back from Lucca at half past midnight this morning, and spent about two minutes sorting the paper post. There were two magazines I needed at least to skim, a letter from the Archbishop of Canterbury to which no reply seemed possible, and nothing else that needed action or attention.

At about nine o’clock this morning, I sat down to catch up with the normal load of reading and organising that I have missed for the last four days. The only things I knew I had to do were to write a thank you note and a couple of of blog postings. This wasn’t one of them. By the time I had finished sorting through the papers, the blogs, and the emails I usually read, it was 3.30 pm. This wasn’t entirely wasted time, I suppose. Three of the things I read, at least, needed action or lent themselves to work in progress. But that is about one potential article or bloggy joke every two hours, which seems to me a pretty low harvesting rate for ephemera. And I still haven’t written that thank you note, or posted the pictures of the Sphinx’s mysterious tits.

Posted in Blather | Comments Off on time and motion

a kedgeree of knowledge

Just back from a three day trip to Lucca — more later — to find SpamAssassin outmanoevred again — 440 spams on the server; 220 made it down to my spam folder. One of those was legitimate. But the number of spams I had got was smaller than the 500 or so entries on bloglines, which are all things I thought, when I left, I might have an interest in. At least one of them was in fact interesting: the unfailingly wonderful Juan Cole explains why Urdu is the language that my mother, and her mother, called Hindustani, and how it got the name:

the national language of Pakistan is Urdu, which was the Muslim lingua franca in Muslim South Asia from the 18th century, and is a Persianized form of what we would now call Hindi. It is taught in schools and spoken alongside the regional languages, though the elite of the country still prefers English and often speaks halting Urdu. Again, it is Indo-European but with a large dose of Arabic, Semitic vocabulary. It is in fact a lot like a Muslim Yiddish. (Historically, “Hindi” is actually a result of a movement of Hindu nationalists to “purify” what was then called Hindustani of the Arabic and Persian words. The Muslims kept the words, and Hindustani came to be called Urdu. Urdu is a Mongolian and Turkish word meaning “military camp” and is the root of the English word “horde.” When the Central Asian tribal warriors came into northern India, Urdu is the creole that ended up being spoken in the camps so that Hindu traders could sell the Muslim grandees their goods).

Posted in Travel notes | Comments Off on a kedgeree of knowledge