Testing … zing!

In a last, or latest attempt to get rid of the 500 errors, and get comments flowing smoothly I have moved this blog to a new provider. It seems have gone smoothly, but please do report errors and omissions here (assuming, of course that I can figure out how to read the email).

Posted in Housekeeping | Comments Off on Testing … zing!

A thought about abortion

The girlfriend of someone I know very slightly recently had a late abortion for purely social reasons: in plain English because neither she nor the father are people anyone would trust as parents. Actually, I don’t know her, but I certainly wouldn’t entrust any baby of mine to the father and I suppose that any woman who would fall in love with him has shown deficient judgment.

My own position on abortion is that I am against late ones for precisely the reasons that I am in favour of embryo research. I think that a baby is certainly a human being, deserving to be treated as an end in itself, at the moment of birth, and just as certainly certainly no such thing at the moment of conception, even supposing you could pin down such a biologically ambiguous moment. Somewhere in between those two dates, things change so that an operation which ought to be freely available in the early part of a pregnancy should be very restricted in the later parts. After all, if a woman really doesn’t want a baby, she can always give it away for adoption. I know this is unpleasant and possibly traumatic, but so, by all accounts, is being killed. And at some stage — shall we say an arbitrary 18 weeks — a foetus becomes something that can be killed.

Now, when I have said this in the past, some women have replied that it is really unfair and brutal of me, since I cannot imagine what it is like to love a baby which has grown in your own stomach, and then to have to give it away. The case I mentioned at the start has crystallised why I feel this is unsatisfactory reasoning. It’s very simple. If the thing-in-the-womb has attained the state where it is truly lovable (and I take on trust that this can happen before birth) then it has also acquired an independent value. It should not be extinguished just to spare the mother pain.

Every week there are cases where parents kill their children rather than allow them to leave, or be taken by another parent in the aftermath of a divorce. We don’t call that love, though no doubt the murderer does. I think that any divorced parent must have heard the faint whisper of that temptation. But it isn’t love, and it isn’t right. If a foetus has grown to the point where the mother really does think of it as a baby, then she should grant it its own autonomy and let it make its way in the world with other parents if she can’t be a mother herself. Sometimes loving someone means letting them go.

Note that this is not an argument that all babies should be born or anything like that. It is directed against the specific, narrow instance in which a late abortion of a healthy foetus is defended because the alternative of adoption would be more painful for the mother. Phooey, I say.

Posted in Blather | 6 Comments

Give this man a job

It is a mystery to me why “Billmon” is not the best known American lefty blogger. I did actually urge the Guardian to recruit him at one stage. I can’t understand why newspapers don’t reprint stuff like this.

UPDATE anyone looking at his site today is going to see a very distressing picture indeed.

Posted in Journalism | 6 Comments

Who can Jesus love?

Some people might think that there is not enough on this blog about Christians. Well, most of what interests me about Austen Ivereigh is libellous, though I may try to write the printable bits of the story. In the mean time, especially for all the rectors out there, here’s A moving theological dilemma

Posted in God | 1 Comment

Apology to commentators

I just found and published around ten comments which had been posted during my Swedish trip and filed as junk by MT without any notification reaching me. I thought after the last upgrade that I would be informed of all the comments that arrived, but the current version seems to have a silent, inaccurate spam filter. All have been restored. I do try to encourage comments here, so this irritating for me and no doubt worse for the people who had taken the trouble to write.

Posted in Housekeeping | Comments Off on Apology to commentators

disconnected shorts

  • One of the canapé fashions in London this year is post-modern fish and chips: a few long thin potato fries arranged around a goujon of cod, and perhaps a couple of whitebait, in a cone of newspaper about the size of a large ice cream cone. Last night, at a party given by a very rich woman, these were served, with two notable twists: the napkins accompanying them were ironed linen, not paper and the paper they came wrapped in was the Wall Street Journal.
  • Something else I learned then. If you have enough money, it is possible to redo the floor of your London house so that it smells, faintly, but distinctly, of the pine dust of Swedish manor house.
  • An encounter with another Guardian writer: “I remember you. You’re the man who says I’m a ghastly woman who writes ghastly things about people.” The other woman present mutters something to the effect of QED. I say — truthfully — that I had never used the word ghastly, and would not. I had said, to her face, that she wrote cruel things. “I’ve been watching your shoes all evening. They’re so clever!” says the third party. The conversation moves into happier regions.
  • Brooding over a curious smothered scandal which bubbled up, or at least appeared in the Daily Mail, while I was away: one of Cardinal Murphy O’Connor’s advisers was accused of procuring an abortion for his then girlfiend in 1989. I remembered a lunch I had with him earlier this year: a very clever, rather attractive man who had spent a good ten minutes trying to persuade me that eventually the whole world would come round to the belief that the unborn foetus was a fully human being. “Come off it”, I said, citing miscarriage statistics. If we really thought that the foetus was equivalent to a human being, we would be prostrated with grief every time a woman had a miscarriage. He pooh-poohed this. It must have been at about that time that another of his discarded mistresses was miscarrying twins, if I have read the Mail story right.
  • Apparently, in Swedish law, it is not a crime to bit torrent American films, though films made in the EU, music, and computer programs are all protected by copyright law. But Swedish law does not recognise that films can be worked on under work for hire, so, in the absence of a specific assignation of rights to the producer, the copyright is shared between the director, the photographer, and even the writer. Therefore, the prosecutor who wrote this opinion (and who later busted the Pirate Bay site) does not feel he can respond to complaints about file sharing from American film companies.
  • Two companies or at least web sites have been set up in Sweden purporting to insure bit torrent users against law suits. Pay them a premium, and they say they will pay your fines. Dear valued Bit torrent user …
  • Last year there were 987 road accidents involving wild boar reported in Sweden.
Posted in Blather | Comments Off on disconnected shorts

Back (from the buzzards)

24 hours and normal service has already resumed: I am sitting at a desk in Essex, faffing, eating too much and resisting the thought of walks because, after all, where could I go that was new or interesting?

But a lot of nice things have happened. Amongst them, I had a really charming fan letter for this, which I wrote in what already seems another lifetime. I think the link will work for a week even for people who don’t subscribe. If it doesn’t, I may commit my own copyright violation under the fold.

Quite unrelated — there is a useful online Swedish-English dictionary which is part of a much larger collection of Swedish to immigrant dictionaries.

Continue reading

Posted in Journalism | 5 Comments

the sweets of fame

Three journalists interviewed me in the last week: the last one came completely at random, as the result of a vox pop on the weather in Uddevalla; someone from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in Sydney tracked me down in a hotel room on the Swedish west coast to say rude things about the Anglican Communion; the arts pages of one of the Stockholm papers interviewed me about the book I am writing, though that has not yet come out.

(updated with links, mostly in Swedish)

To all of them, I explained what I was doing here and when I had lived in Sweden. In the Uddevalla paper, the fact that I had not lived here for twenty years was printed without the “not”. On the ABC site, it appears that I have retreated to Sweden to write a book about the Anglican Communion. Expressen was fine (ie flattering), though one snarky reader noted that the Aurora Borealis is not often seen in the berry picking season.

You have to be written about to realise just how easy inaccuracy is even in the simplest matters, though, god knows, you can learn this lesson by writing, too, if you care too. The point is that in both these cases, the journalist heard or assumed what fitted into the story they were writing.

All this is a long way round to saying that I think last week’s piece on Rowan Williams wasn’t fair. I shall try and write a longer piece defending him later. But his letter was so much clearer than almost everything else he has said on the subject up till now that it suggests he has also started to think clearly. This matters. In particular, I can see in it answers to points I had earlier raised — not that my opinions matter; but there is a sense in which it contains answers to his critics, and it is then ungenerous and wrong just to rehearse old criticisms.

In the mean time I learn from the morning’s paper that the North Sami for “And so I wash it down with coca cola” is “de doidilan kokkákoláin buot” — assuming that they’ve got it right.

Posted in Journalism | 3 Comments

I am so glad that England lost

some football game which was, at least according to Sky News, the most important story of the evening except for the scheduled riot afterwards,which seems to have been postponed by jealous Germans.

In general, I was obviously hoping that England get knocked out quickly because the country would have been absolutely unendurable had we won: a kind of reverse Diana effect.

In particular, to lose because Wayne Rooney got sent off was excellent. He is stupid, vicious thug, with no self-control at all, and thus, obviously, a role model for millions. He might have got away with kicking a prostrate opponent in the balls, and then shoving away the opposing team mate who complained. But when he saw he would be booked, he walked round to swear at the referee for this. Overpaid thugs get away with that kind of thing in almost every match I see. It made my heart sing to see him sent off for it. Makes him a real role model at last.

Posted in Blather | 4 Comments

Possibly the best café in Europe,

for travelers of a bohemian disposition, is here. I know you may be expecting larger or more dramatic travel notes, but I decided that either I dumped my diary here more or less whole, or I did nothing much. So, nothing much it was.

But this has books, wonderful coffee, wifi, and wit. It might be in San Francisco, except that it is not self-conscious in the way it would be there. I suppose you don’t have to worry about the competition so much here.

Posted in Travel notes | 1 Comment