cameras like computers

Engineers can see at once that something labelled the LC52C LA-DC52C is likely to be vitally different from an almost identical piece of plastic called the LC52D LA-DC52D. Shop assistants can’t. That’s why I’m expecting a new camera to take on holiday in a fortnight.

Little Canon compacts, like the Powershot A80 I brought six weeks ago, have a zoom lens that sits flush with the body when it’s off, and then protrudes with a whirr about 2cm when you switch it on. If you want to attach a polarising filter, which people who love fish and water will want to do, you have to buy a conical plastic tube that clips onto the front of the body around the lens, and has a screw-in fitting the other end, about, as I said, 2cm away. It could be a little more. It could be a little less.

On the Canon Powershot A70, it is a little less. On the Powershot A80, it is a little more. But they both have the same bayonet fitting at the end. So when I asked the man in Jessops in Cambridge if he had this device for an A80 (that will be the DVtiddlypumpLD LA-DC52D), he poked around in the stockroom, and came up with the fitment for the A70 (the DVtiddlypumpLC LA-DC52C). I bought it, screwed the filter in, and, outside, switched the camera on. The lens, whirred, protruded, and then the whirring changed pitch and the damn thing wedged itself into the filter.

So, yesterday, back to Jessops where I explained that none of the photographs taken since then were properly sharp at infinity. To their credit, they made no fuss, and arranged to repair the old thing and give me a loaner while it was being fixed. Some time today I will hear about a G3 to play with.

It’s really a lot like software, when version 3.15e is identical to v3.15g except that it causes catastrophic data loss. Oh, and, if software goes wrong and breaks something, you’ll find you have no recompense at all. Just a thought.

This entry was posted in Software. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to cameras like computers

  1. qB says:

    So you’ll be upgrading to a G3 then. You should have gone that extra mile at the beginning.

    What really annoys me is that the ZYX-@%# (read polarising filter for my new beloved camera) costs – wait for it –

  2. el Patron says:

    Actually, I am not going to upgrade to a G3. I shall save all my pennies and buy a Powershot Pro 1 in a year or so when they are cheaper. Now that I have played with a digicam for a while, I can see that the real determinants of quality are the size of the sensor (rather than its pixel count) and the quality of the lens. Oh, and the idiot behind it, but I can’t upgrade that software for love nor money.

Comments are closed.