-
Archives
- October 2019
- September 2019
- November 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- May 2016
- March 2015
- April 2011
- March 2011
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
-
Meta
Category Archives: Science without worms
More Weizenbaum
A lovely passage, from the end of Chapter Seven: A theory is of course itself a conceptual framework. And so it determines what is and what is not to count as fact. The theories—or, perhaps better said, the root metaphors—that … Continue reading Continue reading
Posted in Science without worms
1 Comment
Midgley, Dawkins update and end
I don’t normally cross-post from the Guardian pieces here. But I finally stuck the Midgley/Dawkins story somewhere people might read it and now I know what it feels like to be Madeleine Bunting. It also occurs to me, afterwards, that … Continue reading Continue reading
Posted in Science without worms
4 Comments
Adaptationism contested
Jerry Fodor, in the London Review of Books, takes a swing at adaptationism in the name of Evo-Devo. I’m not sure that he lands any really new or heavy blows, but I have only read it once and I am … Continue reading Continue reading
Posted in Science without worms
4 Comments
Dennett and the appearance of design
Potentilla, in comments, draws attention to Steve Fuller’s defence of his own testimony at the Dover ID trial. There is a 115 comment thread on the Philosopher’s Magazine blog, in which Fuller attempts to defend himself against all comers. Life … Continue reading Continue reading
Posted in Science without worms
3 Comments
Mary Midgley update
She had been due to speak today at a discussion of Intelligent Design in London; she is ill and won’t make it. That’s a shame. I would in any case have missed it, since I have to go to a … Continue reading Continue reading
Posted in Science without worms
2 Comments
Dawkins and Midgley, from comments
Jeremy Ahouse writes: Our host points us to Dawkins’ unburying the hatchet in a recent post. Andrew himself admirably covered this episode between Midgley, Dawkins and Mackie (7, Chapter 5) from the late 70s-early 80s. For fun I reread those … Continue reading Continue reading
Posted in Science without worms
2 Comments
Dawkins, Midgley, disfiguring vanity
I see on Pharyngula that Richard Dawkins has claimed that Mary Midgley confessed to never reading the Selfish Gene before reviewing it in Philosophy. This is untrue, whether or not he believes it. When he first told it me, in, … Continue reading Continue reading
Posted in Science without worms
11 Comments