Because they always end up worshipping lawless power (and also becasue they’re arrogant little pricks). So Declan McCullough’s PR for the Cato Institute is a reliable source of irritaiton. Most recently, he found an economist to argue that Linux was bad for society, provoked in his turn by an editorial in the New York Times<\/i>.<\/p>\n\n
\nDM> Finally, governments should not treat this as an arena for industrial
\nDM> policy. The incentives fueling the Linux movement are not necessarily
\nDM> those required for long-term production of software suited for the public
\nDM> as well as the nerds. Governments, which are as na<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Because they always end up worshipping lawless power (and also becasue they’re arrogant little pricks). So Declan McCullough’s PR for the Cato Institute is a reliable source of irritaiton. Most recently, he found an economist to argue that Linux was … Continue reading