Different from Kipling, how?
Tuesday November 15, 2005; part of: War

There is a long plug/interview with Robert Kaplan in the Atlantic Monthly online (not sure if it's paywalled) which fills me with a soft despair. Here's why:

Instead of the oppressive colonial domination that characterized other empires, Kaplan describes America as spreading its imperial influence through humanitarian aid efforts such as well-digging, medical care, and school construction. These days, imperialism means that soldiers seek to adapt to the mores of the places where they're stationed, rather than forcing those places to knuckle under to imported ideas. Green Berets in Afghanistan wear keffiyas and grow beards; they drink tea with tribal leaders and take time to know both people and place. Instead of fierce generals or conquest-hungry marauders, Kaplan found thoughtful, caring, and disciplined soldiers who everyday face the impossible task of "making countries out of places that were never meant to be countries."

I'm quite prepared to accept this as sometimes true, and always, among the decent imperialists, an aspiration, though perhaps a naive one: I don't remember, from childhood visits to the unimaginable profusions of the PX in Bonn, very much engagement with the German culture around it. And let's leave Iraq out of the picture for the moment, though it is the central front in the American imperialist project. The most astonishing thing is Kaplan's assertion that these "thoughtful, caring, and disciplined soldiers" are unlike all their predecessors. What does he think the British empire was like, or even the French? That phrase about making countries out of places that were never meant to be countries translates quite well into French -- I think it would be something like La mission civilisatrice. And the idea of our brave soldiers accepted by their brave enemies is one that everyone finds irresistible, whenever they invade Afghanistan. The wars there all seem to have the same outcome, though.

This isn't (just) point scoring. If American can't even acknowledge its predecessor empires, let alone learn from their mistakes, what chance does it have of avoiding their fate?

Posted by andrewb at November 15, 2005 10:13 AM
Comments
Post a comment
Textile formatting works here. Double hyphens are automatically converted to en dashes, quotes are automatically smartened. You can put dashes and asterisks around text to make italics bold and other silly effects easily.
  • Text wrapped in Asterisks which * will be bold. The asterisks must touch each end of the bold text. There must a space before the first and after the last.
  • Text wrapped in underscores - _ - will be italicised. The underscores must touch each end of the italics. There must a space before the first and after the last.
  • Paragraphs starting bq. will be block quoted. There must be no space before the "b" and one space after the full stop.
  • A hyperlink is made by wrapping the link text in double quotes, followed immediately by a colon, then the URL. If there is a question mark in the URL, wrap the whole lot in square brackets.
  • I use two classes to mark up text that deserves it. sane text looks like this. loony text looks like that. The syntax for those is %(sane)[space] sane text %; loony is left as an exercise to the reader.
Name:



Email Address:



URL:



Comments:



Remember info?